25 February 2009

When the going gets tough...

Sometimes we need a swift kick in the pants and a bit of encouragement. We are not quitters! Quitters did not build this nation. Quitters did not sustain this country. We, as a nation, have seen harder times and muddled through, and we will do it again.

By DAVID ESPO
AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON – To a nation reeling from recession and facing long-festering problems, President Barack Obama has a simple reminder: "We are not quitters."

Whatever the problems, the new president promised in the first prime-time speech of his term, "We will rebuild, we will recover and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before."

Standing before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, Obama optimistically sketched an agenda that began with jobs, then broadened quickly to include a stable credit system, better schools, health care reform, reliable domestic sources of energy and an end to the war in Iraq. Specifics will follow, he said, although he conceded more billions may be necessary to stabilize the banking system.

The president drew loud cheers as he made his way down the center aisle, again when he stood, alone, at the podium to speak, and several more times in an address delivered in a hall packed with lawmakers, members of his administration, Supreme Court justices and diplomats.
Humorous and poignant moments took their turns on a night when virtually the entire government gathered under one heavily secured roof.

As when Obama explained his decision to have Vice President Joe Biden oversee implementation of his stimulus plan by saying, "Nobody messes with Joe."

Or when he urged lawmakers to pass education legislation named in part for Massachusetts' Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, battling brain cancer. The 77-year-old lawmaker "has never stopped asking what he can do for his country," Obama said, rephrasing an enduring line from President John F. Kennedy's 1960 inaugural address.

Biden followed up Wednesday morning by serving notice that the administration would be poised to take back unused stimulus money if governors refused to spend it.
Another option, he spelled out on ABC's "Good Morning America," would be to "use the television and the radio and the media to embarrass them for not doing what they're supposed to do."

Biden said the money "cannot be squandered" and warned that states will be held accountable for what they do with the money.

Little more than one month into the president's term, Obama's speech followed congressional passage of an $787 billion stimulus bill, coincided with pending proposals to stem an epidemic of mortgage foreclosures and served as prelude to a budget Obama pledged will cut projected deficits in half by the end of his term.

The new president submits his tax and spending plans to Congress on Thursday.

With solid Democratic majorities in both houses, Obama can count on a reliable base of support as he pushes his agenda. But his drive for bipartisanship depends in part on his standing in the polls — strong so far — and his speech was aimed at lawmakers as well as the viewing public.
"What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more," he said.

Republicans said they were ready to work with Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress — up to a point.

"Where we agree, Republicans must be the president's strongest partners. And where we disagree, Republicans have a responsibility to be candid and offer better ideas for a path forward," said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, tapped by party leaders to deliver the GOP response.

Jindal, the first Indian-American governor in history, also took the opportunity to pledge to voters his party would try to regain their trust after an election in which Democrats not only won, elevating the first African-American to the White House, but strengthened their majorities in Congress.

"We will do so by standing up for the principles that we share," he said.

The president seemed to do a little political positioning of his own.

He said the recently passed stimulus legislation was designed to "put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government — I don't." And despite what his critics claim, he said, no family with an income of less than $250,000 would face higher taxes because of his plan.

While Obama's speech was short on specifics, his remarks hinted at legislative battles ahead with Democrats as well as Republicans in Congress.

He said he had already identified $2 trillion in savings to be achieved over the next decade, adding: "We will end education programs that don't work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't need them. We'll eliminate no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq."

He also pledged to "root out the waste, fraud and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn't make our seniors any healthier," an apparent reference to the subsidies the government pays to private insurance companies offering an alternative to traditional Medicare under a program long nourished by Republicans.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

24 February 2009

Rachel getting married

Some shots of my cousin Rachel before her nuptials this past Saturday:









23 February 2009

Interesting...

Our photographs can have a bigger impact than we might expect, long after we click the shutter.

photo courtesy of Jonathan Saunders

Stephanie Clifford from The New York Times writes:

On Oct. 7, 1999, a young photographer named Jonathan Saunders hauled his camera gear across town to the Lipstick Building in Midtown Manhattan for one of his first portrait assignments.

Fortune had selected Mr. Saunders to photograph a middle-aged investor, for an article discussing the investor’s pioneering approach to the markets. “Don’t be on the opposite side of a 100,000-share trade,” the investor said in the accompanying article, “because anyone trading 100,000 shares knows more than you do.”

Ten years later, it turned out it was the investor himself who knew either more, or less, depending on your perspective, than just about anyone in the markets.

The investor was Bernard L. Madoff, and the 80 or so frames that Mr. Saunders took during their 15-minute session a decade ago are suddenly in demand.

“There have been some photo shoots of him, but a lot were very old,” said Robert Priest, the design director of Condé Nast Portfolio, which put an image from Mr. Saunders’s shoot on its March cover. “We felt this one represented Mr. Madoff at his prime.”

Mr. Saunders had largely forgotten about the session when a photo editor from The Wall Street Journal called him in mid-December, asking for a copy of a photo of Mr. Madoff.

“I was like, that’s kind of weird, that’s a 10-year-old portrait I did of a guy I don’t remember, and they were very eager to pay my minimum and get it in the paper,” Mr. Saunders said. “Then, within five or six hours, there was an avalanche of Google news alerts about it, and I was like, oh. I’d better make better scans.”

Photos from the shoot have run in The Journal and The Daily News, and Mr. Saunders is fielding requests from television stations and the international media.

The images from the session are all rather one-note, Mr. Saunders said. “Most of them, he just looks kind of bored. Some he’s looking very serious,” he said. On the trading floor, he did get Mr. Madoff to crack a smile.

But for its cover, Portfolio went with one of Mr. Madoff standing in a hallway, looking serene and self-assured.

“The people who invested with him seemed to be completely confident in his management of the money,” Mr. Priest said. “I think that expression shows there. He seems like a very strong personality, and yet with warm eyes. This expression sort of said what those people saw in him.”

One more about Fairey

Just in case you are keeping track...

David Hauslaib from Jossip has this to say:

It took the Associated Press more than seven months to find out artist Shepard Fairey created his Obama "Hope" poster based on one of the news consortium's photos. It also took Shepard Fairey actually telling the AP that he used their photo for them to notice and get all lawsuit-happy. Because, yep, the AP is now ready to sue him him for copyright infringement. (And he's also ready to sue them!! Their attorneys are meeting to discuss the matter.) But what if the AP doesn't hold the exclusive image of Obama posed in such a way? What if there is a Creative Commons version of a terribly similar photo that allows the "sharing" and "remixing" of the photo?

Then either: 1) Fairey is foolish for acknowledging the AP as his inspiration; 2) He could've easily fallen back on the explanation that he used a legitimately licensed photo to create his poster, and been off the hook for the whole thing.

Or both.

As the above image demonstrates, a CC-licensed photo that shows Obama in a very similar, nearly indistinguishable pose exists. And there are likely many more out there, if Lessig.org has any say about it. Of course, this photo (above right) in particular carries a license that says anyone who uses the image must credit its author — which Fairey's usage failed to do. Since he snagged the AP's image.

Cooper, TX

17 February 2009

Hooray!

Having fond memories of snapshots taken by my mom with one, and owning a few instant cameras myself, I was saddened when Polaroid announced that they would stop producing film for its instant cameras. But good news, fellow lomography enthusiasts:

from The New York Times:

Before the advent of the digital camera, Polaroid reigned supreme when it came to photographs you could view in an instant. When the company announced last year that it would cease film production and abandon the technology that made it famous, the format seemed doomed to disappear.

Now a group of Polaroid enthusiasts are trying to create an entirely new instant film product, compatible with Polaroid cameras, that would keep the medium alive.

André Bosman, a former Polaroid employee, and Florian Kaps, a former manager of the
Lomographic Society, an online community for film enthusiasts, solicited financing from private donors to purchase the remainder of the film manufacturing equipment from Polaroid. The two also leased the company’s factory in the Netherlands for their effort, cheekily called “The Impossible Project.”

Mr. Bosman and Mr. Kaps recruited a team of 10 film technicians, chemists and engineers – most of whom were employed at Polaroid during its heyday – to collaborate on inventing a new instant film pack. Mr. Kaps estimates that the venture has enough money to finance production for one year, and his goal is to begin manufacturing by 2010.

Mr. Kaps declined to provide details on the costs of purchasing the Polaroid film equipment or the amount of financing his team has, except to say it was in the “low millions.”

His hope is that the efforts of the Impossible Project will jump-start a revival of analog photography, in the same way that vinyl record collectors have fueled a thriving subculture and continued production. “This is a last chance to keep another analog iconic medium from disappearing,” Mr. Kaps said. “This is a unique medium and it deserves a second chance.”

Given the affordability of digital cameras, the popularity of cellphones equipped with cameras and the ease of sharing digital photos through sites like Facebook and Flickr, it might seem difficult to comprehend why anyone would want to dabble in a medium that can be clunky and expensive. (A pack of instant film for a vintage Polaroid camera like the SX-70 can run as high as $100 on eBay.) But for many analog film enthusiasts, the spectrum of color variations and the general unpredictability of the format are a large part of the appeal and the aesthetic of the product.

The tricky part of Mr. Kaps’s campaign will be concocting a new instant film recipe that works in the old cameras. Most of the materials and chemical components used in Polaroid’s instant film packs are out of production and no longer available. It’s also likely that any solution devised by Mr. Kaps’s team of experts won’t be cheap on the consumer end, either.

For Mr. Kaps, it’s a shot in the dark worth taking. “There is no chance we can reproduce the original instant film,” he said. “But we think there is a chance to produce a new kind of film and preserve this medium.”

11 February 2009

Rough weather

From WFAA.com:

Weather Blog: The Morning After

A line of storms swept through the North Texas area swiftly Tuesday evening and damaged dozens of homes in its path. North Texas remains under a Wind Advisory until noon Wednesday.

For the nearly hour-by-hour coverage of yesterdays storm, go here.

Some horrible weather makes for some beautiful photographs:

(taken by PrestC17 / WFAA.com visitor)


(taken by Darkanion / WFAA.com visitor)

On a personal note:
Last night, as I was driving home from class, I saw an awful lot of lightning on the horizon. Full aware that a storm was brewing, I turned on KRLD 1080 AM to hear what I was in store for. Holy smokes, were the weather reports horrid! Bulletins from The National Weather Service kept interrupting the already ominous reporting. The moment I crossed the Royse City city limits sign, I got a call from Manjill warning me that the weather was really bad from Rockwall to Mesquite, and that he had to pull over to (pun coming up...) weather the storm. Well, at this point, I had a semi-truck in front of me and one right behind me and the country road provided me nowhere to take shelter. So I gripped the steering wheel tight and braced for the worsening wind and rain. My windshield wipers could not beat fast enough to keep a clear view of the road ahead; I couldn't even see two feet in front of my car! The wind was so rough; it kept veering me to the right and I was afraid that there might be a steep drop to the side of the highway. I finally made it to the west of the passing storm where it was still pouring buckets, but without the reported 60 m.p.h. winds. I can not describe how incredibly relieved I was to reach home. I was extremely lucky and very fortunate that I did make it home safe. Not to over dramatize, but it really was scary driving in those conditions. Once inside, I turned on the television to see the reports and they were heartbreaking. Oklahoma City was hit the worst. That poor city just can't get a break. Colleyville was hit hardest locally, but the entire DFW metroplex experienced some extreme weather last night. I just hope this is not a preview of what spring will bring.

Ding Ding!

And the gloves go on. Shepard Fairey is fighting back against the AP's accusation of copyright infringement. I think this could get nasty.

From The Boston Herald:

NEW YORK — An artist who created a famous image of Barack Obama before he became president sued The Associated Press today, asking a judge to find that his use of an AP picture in creating the poster did not violate copyright law.

The lawsuit Monday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan said Los Angeles street artist Shepard Fairey did not violate the copyright of the April 2006 photograph because he dramatically changed the nature of the image.

The AP has said it is owed credit and compensation for the artist’s rendition of the picture, taken by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.

Lawyers for Fairey acknowledged that the artist used the photograph. But they said he transformed the literal depiction into a "stunning, abstracted and idealized visual image that creates powerful new meaning and conveys a radically different message."

AP spokesman Paul Colford said the company would have no immediate comment until its lawyers reviewed the lawsuit. The AP had said in a statement last week that it was in discussions with Fairey’s attorney and hoped for an amicable solution.

The AP has not taken legal action against Fairley. But the lawsuit noted that the AP had threatened twice to sue Fairey, possibly as early as Tuesday, and that it considered all works that incorporate the imagery of the "Obama Hope" poster to be infringements of its copyrights.

The lawsuit said the purpose of the photograph documented the day’s events while Fairey’s art, titled "Obama Progress" and "Obama Hope," was meant "to inspire, convince and convey the power of Obama’s ideals, as well as his potential as a leader, through graphic metaphor."
Fairey’s image became popular on buttons, posters and Web sites. It showed a pensive Barack Obama looking upward. It was splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.

The lawsuit noted that Fairey first began distributing his Obama images in early 2008 and that Obama thanked him in a Feb. 22 letter for his contribution to the presidential campaign.
The lawsuit was brought on Fairey’s behalf by the Stanford Law School’s Fair Use Project and a San Francisco-based law firm.

"There should be no doubt about the legality of Fairey’s work," said Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project. "He used the photograph for a purpose entirely different than the original, and transformed it dramatically."

The lawsuit was filed on the same day that Fairey appeared in a Boston courtroom, where he pleaded not guilty to charges he tagged property with graffiti. He allegedly vandalized the property last month as part of one of his street art campaigns.

"It’s a suppression of an artist’s freedom of expression," Fairey said of the AP lawsuit before his attorney, Jeffrey Wiesner, advised him not to say anything else.

The 38-year-old Los Angeles resident was arrested Friday when he was in Boston for an event kicking off his exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art.

Influences

When it comes to images that pull me in and inspire me, I find myself drawn to two polar opposites. I revere stark, striking, chiaroscuro black and white photographs that pull the light out from the dark. I am also fascinated by images whose colors are so bold, so bright, and so vivid, that they seem to scream out at you. I'm inspired not only by the visual stimuli of photographs and films but by music as well. For me, when I hear the brash gritty, in-your-face music from, or think of, The Clash, Henry Rollins, and Iggy Pop, my brain registers them in black and white. But when I listen to Talking Heads or Regina Spektor, I think of rich, bright, pure color. That being said, these are the artists/images/experiences that rock my socks off!

(All images are sole copyright of their artist.)

Color:








Films:
Rear Window, Harold and Maude

Black & White:
(works are in color, yes, but inspires me in his usage of dark and light)







Herb Ritts





Films:
La Strada, A Taste of Honey

04 February 2009

Who's right? Who's wrong?


Shepard Fairey,who spawned the OBEY giant movement, is being taken to task by the Associated Press for his use of the now ubiquitous Barack Obama image:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_en_ot/obama_poster

It will be interesting to see what the outcome of this will be and what effect, if any, it will have on Fair Use.

Another interesting article, from Oct. '08: